Déjà Reboot: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre

unnamedThe Old:  In 1974, Tobe Hooper was responsible for a lot of deaths. Not literally (that anyone knows of), but he was definitely responsible for some faintings.  The original The Texas Chainsaw Massacre was known for being one of the most terrifying films of its’ time, so much so that people passed out in the theatres.  While it can be seen as being cheesy for modern audiences, the scares and tension absolutely stand the test of time.

 

The New:  In 2003, we got an update on this horror classic with a hot, young cast lead by Jessica Biel.  Naturally, in the vein of modern horror, the remake went for more of the gore and guts than actual tension and scares.  However, the stylish and bleak cinematography and high-tension chase scenes made for what a basic horror fan could find entertaining.

 

unnamedThe Verdict:  Out of obligation, I must recommend the original TCM.  It really is horrifying and it set the standard for 70s, 80s and 90s horror classics.   However, the remake does add a bit more story for the sake of drama (as pointless as that drama may have turned out to be) and is worth a catch at least once, as it does have its’ fair share of scares.   Plus… It’s bloody CREEPY!

“Snowpiercer” Penetrates, Provokes and Gets Political

If you are a fan of the science fiction genre, then you probably became elated at the sight of the first trailer for Snowpiercer.  Although the trailer itself does not reveal too much, it tells us genre nerds just enough of what we need to know to become intrigued.  The set up is rather simple.

In a post-apocalyptic world, this little known phenomenon called “global warming” has taken mass effect, actually doing the exact opposite of warming the globe.  The entire planet has essentially been plunged into a new ice age, now covered in a freezing layer of snow and ice, making it uninhabitable.  Almost the entire population of Earth has been wiped out, and the few remaining survivors live aboard a futuristic train called…you guessed it…Snowpiercer.

DISCLAIMER: Spoilers ahead. Real life, major spoilers. Read at your own risk!

So now we have a somewhat intriguing, if not slightly lopsided, set up of our world.  Then comes the deep stuff.  Inside the train (the exact length of which is never specified) the varying cars are divided up by social class, the lowest of which reside in the tail-end of the train.  Naturally, the privileged live towards the front of the train.  The train is said to run on a “perpetual engine” that can never die, and said engine was created by the mysterious Wilford, a God-like figure whom is worshipped by those on the front of the train, and utterly loathed by those on the back.  Social allegories galore!

unnamedOne determined young man named Curtis (Chris Evans), living in the tail-end under the mentorship of an old man named Gilliam (John Hurt), is sick of his life feeding on nothing but gelatin-like protein bars (revealed to be made of something rather unmentionable).  He wants what the privileged have (Sushi).  He dreams of forcing his way to the front.  He initiates a rebellion with the help of some of the tail-enders, consisting of an excellent ensemble cast that includes Octavia Spencer, Jamie Bell and Ewen Bremner.

In order to make it through, they take into captivity Mason (Tilda Swinton), a bureaucratic cult-leader type who represents those from the front of the train and perhaps bows down the lowest to Wilford.  As the biggest source of comic relief, she is by far one of the most dynamic and entertaining characters and Swinton’s performance made the film that much more watchable.

As the group of scrappy tail-enders force their way towards the front, we as the audience are immersed in some truly magnificent action sequences and cinematography. For such a contained setting, director Bong Joon-ho was able to get very creative with the camerawork.  Not to mention the frozen world outside is very well done, creating a landscape that looks truly terrifying.

Upon reaching the very front of the train, where the perpetual engine presides, Curtis is finally able to confront Wilford (Ed Harris). Without spoiling too much, it is revealed that Curtis was essentially fooled into leading the rebellion, to be used as a sick way of population control for those in the tail-end.  As stated by Wilford, natural selection doesn’t work quickly enough on the train.

qdb0lpeziftf2pyc1zwdI will force myself to stop at this point, as there are many more twists revealed within the final act.  However, with all the aforementioned criticisms about a one-sided viewpoint being driven throughout the storyline of fairness and equality, the film is quite an experience in itself and it uses a lot of symbolism for life and redemption. As films go, it has a solid story and extremely well-written characters.  Of course, the ensemble cast never ceases to entertain amidst the 2-hour-plus runtime.  I never once found myself wondering when it would end.

All in all, “Snowpiercer” is definitely worth a view.  Although it was only given a limited theatrical release, it will be available on as of this Friday, July 11th.

Déjà Reboot: A Nightmare on Elm Street

As a fan of the horror genre (a genre that has been most frequently victimized by the age of remakes), I can say that remakes aren’t always bad. Of course there are some exceptions, but in the recent tradition of Hollywood, making a quick dime is what’s really important, so why not churn out some cheap-budget version of a cult classic horror flick in order to turn a decent profit?  That’s exactly what they’ve been doing…for years. So with a respectful nod to the hot commodity that has been the horror remake, I bring you “Deja Reboot” – The “Nightmare” edition.

When A Nightmare on Elm Street was first released in 1984, the film’s villain Freddy Krueger struck fear in audiences around the nation. It contained an original story that hadn’t been seen before and a new kind of villain that could physically torture and kill you in your dreams. Director Wes Craven was genius to bring this new twist of horror to life. Not to mention Robert Englund made a very terrifying Freddy Krueger. What made the original so terrifying is that we’d never seen a villain like Freddy before. When we think of sleeping, we think of being at peace, a time to ultimately relax and let go of all of our worries. However, this film takes that away from us. Craven took a peaceful function of the human body and made it a place to be feared. On top of that, “Nightmare” also presented a cast of relatable characters, as well as a compellingly complex villain in Freddy.

The "Nightmare" Reboot
The “Nightmare” Reboot

The remake was a semi-faithful adaptation in the visual sense, but it tried to tie up loose ends that might not have been made clear in the original. In other words, there was an abundance of exposition. Exposition is good; over-exposition is bad. The story behind Freddy in the original is that he was a child rapist whom parents of the town hunted down. In this case, it was Nancy’s mom describing to us what had happened, which explains why Freddy is trying to kill Nancy (our heroine). However, it is not made clear why he is killing her friends. The remake takes it one step further by trying to connect all of the characters in order to explain why Freddy wants to kill them all.

Here is where the reboot fails. It tries to take an original story and add so much that it ends up getting muddy. There is no sense of mystery. In the original, Freddy’s face is kept mostly in the shadows until the end of the film. This makes Freddy’s character all the more frightening. There’s something truly terrifying in not knowing what you’re being chased by.  However, in the remake, Freddy is completely exposed. There is no attempt to hide his mangled features in order to taunt the audience. Not to mention the “new” Freddy did not look nearly as frightening. He looked far more like an animal.

All in all, while the reboot may not have been quite as bad as one might have expected, with a mostly-entertaining cast and an interesting style, the original trumps it in the most important category (i.e. being a scary horror movie).

Climbing the Hollywood Hill

To anyone who has ever dreamt of being “someone,” it can be almost unanimously agreed upon that Hollywood is the place to be. Of course, “someone” is mostly arbitrary and subject to one’s own opinion of the term.  It’s mind-boggling to think of the way we are trained from such an early age to believe in the falsehoods of fame and fortune, and, even moreso, that we could be the exception to the rule.  At the ripe young age of 8 (roughly the age when I personally realized my love for the film world), who could know any better?

So as we go through puberty, and grow into young adults, we start to take this love for entertainment to be something much more valuable than just a “love for entertainment.” We want it to be our lives. We want it to be the focus of our careers. We gradually aspire to become the next individual voice of our own generation because what “I” have is unique.  No one else has ever had the ideas “I” have.  “I” am going to make it.

unnamedThen college happens (if such the route is chosen) and we start seeking internships. We strive for Hollywood because that’s where it all happens.  The fact that we don’t actually realize what Hollywood is at this point is moot. We just want to be there.  We want to get our hands dirty and start building that resume. So we dabble for a summer or a semester in the illusion that is the glamorous Hollywood life. It’s our first time experiencing “the real world,” even though we have no idea what it’s really like when we’re still under the academia’s protection.  We return home, telling our friends that we had the time of our lives (because at the wise, intuitive age of 21, we probably did) and that we can’t wait to graduate and go back.

Then we come back.  The struggle becomes oh so real.  This is where the reality of the “real world” sets in. Now, some may call me jaded, but I personally believe that it’s necessary to have at least a small chip on your shoulder.  Especially in this business, you have to be just jaded enough to not be naïve enough to not be jaded.  In laymen’s terms, you can’t be oblivious to the point of selling out.  As we try to carve a path for ourselves and begin to pursue what we’ve always believed was our dream, we start to realize the painful truth of that saying that’s always felt so cliché; “Good things come to those who wait.” Key word: Wait.  Waiting…and waiting…and more waiting.

One of my personal favorite lines about the business, which can apply to any young adult pursuing their dream career; “The key to success is failure and persistence.”  There is something terrifying, yet reassuring about this.  It implies that we must fail (terrifying), yet if we’re failing, we are, in a strange way, succeeding (reassuring).  Because if we are failing, at the very least, it means we are putting ourselves out there. We’re exposing ourselves to the possibilities of success rather than being too afraid to pursue it all together. I believe that the bottom line is to pick a goal and stick to it. Work the system.  You will undoubtedly face some of (if not THE) most challenging situations of your life on this journey, but why not look at those situations as a way to grow, rather than a road bump that we can’t get over?  Shifting gears back into positivity, if we push through the most difficult times and continue to pursue that dream that was so realistic to us at the ages of 8 and 21, what could possibly stop us? We are the next generation. YOU are a part of that generation.  Someone has to be next in line, why not you?