dallas_buyers_club2

Dallas Buyers Club Reminds Us That The FDA Is Trying To Turn Everything Into An Illegal Drug

DBCRon Woodroof fought for the right to use non-FDA approved drugs as a means of treatment after he was diagnosed with HIV in the 1980s.  As a result, he began distributing experimental drugs to AIDS patients who were unable to acquire them at hospitals.  Woodroof’s legacy lives on in the 2013 film, “Dallas Buyers Club,” directed by Jean-Marc Vallée.

The film opens with Woodroof’s diagnosis; he’s given 30 days to live.  Thinking he’s a homosexual, his friends and coworkers ostracize him.  When Woodroof finally seeks treatment, he is put on AZT, the only FDA-approved drug in America at the time, but this only worsens his condition.  Woodroof eventually travels to Mexico to find help, and there he’s treated with ddC and peptide T, drugs not approved by the FDA.

After three months on these new drugs, Woodroof’s condition improves and it occurs to him that he can make money smuggling ddC and peptide T into America for other HIV patients.  He teams up with Rayon, an HIV positive trans woman, who helps Woodroof get inside the gay community.  Together, Ron and Rayon form the Dallas Buyers Club, which provides the non-approved drugs to HIV patients at a price.  The club becomes very successful, but is short-lived, as the FDA is constantly trying to find ways to shut them down and make it harder for Woodroof to sell his own drugs.

Woodroof attempts to sue the FDA, seeking the right to take peptide T, which at this point has been proven to be a non-toxic drug.  Although he loses the court case, it is stated at the end of the film that Woodroof was eventually able to take peptide T for his own personal use up until his death.  He was also one of the main reasons that hospitals in America would eventually reduce the dosage of AZT it would administer to its patients after the drug was found to be toxic.

Dallas Buyers Club is based on a true story about what can happen to American patients when their health care system is fraught with bureaucratic roadblocks.  The government spends more than 50 per cent of all health care dollars and costs have been driven up by the FDA’s actions and deprived Americans of much-needed treatments.

(more…)

Trailer Tuesday: “Men, Women, & Children”

Ever wonder what’s going on with Adam Sandler? Yeah, me neither.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m a huge fan of him from his prime, but the poor guy has become pretty irrelevant over the last few years.  But hey, that’s the natural progression of the entertainment culture we all love so much, right?

unnamed-1Anyway, before I become too cynical, the trailer for his new film titled “Men, Women & Children” was recently released, also starring Jennifer Garner, Ansel Elgort and Judy Greer amongst several other talented actors of recent times. First of all, it’s hard to get a good idea of what this movie is really about just from the title.  I have to say, it’s so bland and vague, it almost turned me off from watching the trailer entirely.  But I’m rather glad I stuck with my original plan of sitting in my computer chair and clicking through trailers for hours on end.

We are instantly exposed to the unique but eerily familiar world of “Men, Women & Children” when the first shot opens on a cafeteria full of adolescents with their iPhones and other electronics in hand. As they navigate the halls of the school, the content of every text, email and profile being viewed by these individuals is displayed on-screen as a graphic above their heads, almost like a thought bubble…but less thoughtful.  Transitioning to an older couple, we see Sandler and his wife in bed, each holding what look like iPads or some form of electronic tablets, not making much of any contact whatsoever.  With no dialogue or unnamed-1communication to be had, except for the text displayed on screen, the trailer almost plays out like a two-and-a-half minute montage over chillingly effective music.  Each character is introduced utilizing some form of technology as a means of communication, as opposed to face-to-face communication.  And therein lies the purpose (which is driven home pretty hard from the first five seconds of the trailer).  If you can’t already see where I’m going with this, it’s essentially about the effects that technology has on our lives.  That’s what I gathered, although it did leave me wanting to know more.  Job well done for that.  It also seemed creatively effective to have no dialogue spoken throughout the trailer, perhaps to enforce the overall idea that the film is about a lack of communication between people today.

It didn’t seem to give away too much, and although I hope it doesn’t turn out to be a film that preaches the “dangers of technology,” it does come from Jason Reitman who directed “Up In the Air” and “Juno,” which are two wonderful films in my opinion.  All in all, this trailer felt inventive and got me wondering what it was all adding up to.  The jury is still out on Sandler in this seemingly deep, dramatic role, but I’ll definitely be catching this one in theatres!  How about you?